Northlight Supply AI Pilot Selection Workshop
Saved from a real model-generated preparation on 5 September 2026 using fictional materials. Exploring this example does not run the model.
Opens an editable brief.
View the original brief75 minutes · In person
AudienceNine nontechnical business leaders at fictional Northlight Supply: operations, commercial and service managers. All can compare simple whole-number scores; none needs coding experience.
ObjectiveIn 75 minutes, choose exactly one eligible AI pilot using the supplied gate, scoring rule and tie-breaker. Produce one decision card naming the chosen option, gate result, score, reason, supplied owner role, two-week pilot scope, success measure and stop rule, plus a reason for each rejected or deferred option.
Workshop constraints
Use only the two fictional sources. All companies, policies and figures are invented exercise inputs, not customer evidence. No live accounts, personal data, provider calls, automatic customer actions or implementation. Participants work in three tables of three using paper or a plain text worksheet included in the pack. Apply eligibility before scoring. Use the supplied owner roles and measure; do not invent savings, calendar dates or completed commitments. Keep the main exercise to a decision card and three option dispositions.
The saved workshop pack
Intended workshop outcomeParticipants will evaluate three fictional AI pilot options against Northlight Supply's eligibility criteria, score eligible options, apply tie-breaking rules, and produce an agreed decision card selecting Option A (Public Product FAQ Drafting) owned by the Service Lead, along with clear disposition rationales for all three options.
Proposed agenda · Review the activities for your audience.
Elapsed minutes
Introduction & Evaluation Framework Setup
- 00—10minutes
Introduction & Evaluation Framework Setup
Welcome the 9 operations, commercial, and service managers organized into three tables of three. Review workshop boundaries: fictional exercise inputs only, no live customer systems or provider calls, and strict sequence of applying the eligibility gate before any scoring or tie-breaking . Introduce the three fictional pilot options A, B, and C .
- 10—25minutes
Option Review & Eligibility Gating
In three tables of three, participants evaluate options A, B, and C against the mandatory eligibility gate: only supplied public product text or synthetic requests allowed, outputs must be human-reviewed drafts, and no changing customer records, sending messages, or issuing refunds . Tables record gate pass/fail status and specific failure reasons, filtering out ineligible options before calculating scores .
- 25—55minutes
Pilot Scoring & Decision Card Exercise
Working in small groups, participants complete the decision exercise. For eligible options, calculate total score (stated business value + stated readiness), apply the tie-breaker rule (lower effort number wins ties), select the winning pilot, and populate the final decision card and option dispositions worksheet . Ground the decisions in the option cards .
- 55—67minutes
Table Readouts & Cross-Group Synthesis
Each table presents its completed decision card and disposition rationale. Compare results across tables to confirm consensus on Option A selection, tie-breaker logic (Option A effort 1 vs Option C effort 3), Option B gate rejection rationale, and Option C deferral rationale . Review against the option criteria .
- 67—75minutes
Decision Card Alignment & Governance Wrap-up
Consolidate the final agreed decision card. Review the pilot boundaries: Option A two-week pilot scope, Service Lead ownership, success measure, and explicit stop rule . Confirm that the two-week pilot duration begins only after an actual start is agreed, leaving start and follow-up dates undated .
Saved checks and content review
These results were recorded with this saved draft. Timing and reference checks passed: 75 / 75 minutes.
AI-assisted content review
Draft 2 · No issues flagged by this review
Model-assisted feedback. Verify facts, audience fit and facilitation choices before using the workshop.
Review details · AI-assisted
- Workshop goal · No issue flagged
The pack fully meets the brief: exercise instructions and sampleResponse produce a complete decision card for Option A (gate result, score calculation 4+4=8, tie-break rationale, single accountable Service Lead owner, 2-week pilot scope, success measure, stop rule) and provide explicit disposition reasons for options A, B, and C as required by s01-pilot-rules and s01-option-cards.
- Audience · No issue flagged
The design fits nontechnical commercial, operations, and service leaders: tasks rely on basic whole-number scoring (1-5) and straightforward qualitative gates without coding, technical terminology, or external policy prerequisites.
- Source claims · No issue flagged
All statements, scores, gate rules, and roles are grounded in s01-pilot-rules and s01-option-cards. Option B is disqualified before scoring due to unreviewed refunds, and Option A breaks the score tie with Option C based on lower effort (1 vs 3) under Service Lead ownership.
- Constraints · No issue flagged
All brief constraints are honored: total duration is 75 minutes across 5 segments; participants work in 3 tables of 3; eligibility precedes scoring; no live customer systems, provider calls, savings estimates, or calendar dates are introduced.
- Exercise completeness · No issue flagged
The exercise is self-contained with complete scenario data, explicit instructions, worksheet templates, debrief prompts, and an answer key. It is accurately mapped to agendaSectionIndex 2 with a 30-minute allocation matching the segment duration.
Take the example with you
Download the saved pack as PDF to read or print, or Word to edit. Fictional example; review before use.